Prejudices that Destroy the Law

The review considers the article “Axioms that destroy law,” dedicated to decision of European Court Human Rights (ECHR) in case legality refusal Russian authorities register marriage between three same-sex couples. author peer-reviewed justifies his criticism this with new axiomatics, is, some postulates taken without proof, from which, opinion, ECHR proceeds. proposed shows such axiomatics Ruling are not observed either an open — direct, textually expressed form, or a hidden, indirectly meaning extracted decision. On contrary, proves its original premises by inviting substantiate harm that, their might arise if legal institute unions were introduced country, and also calls for finding fair balance public interests applicants. At same time, does insist on unpopular country’s opinion recognition marriages Russia. proposes common grounds compromises supporters opponents unions: as such, offers well-known axioms equality, respect human dignity. He real principles country is caused existing prejudices, axioms, moreover, have been found yet.